Written by
Anonymous Coward(0)
on
2009-5-1 (金) at 5:55 pm
COMMENT
This is awesome.
LOGIN FAIL
I tried to log in for a while, but angerwhale claims I'm not 0x9a0cda99... and I most certainly am. That login either needs better directions or smarter behaviors -- otherwise, openid is probably a better option.
Re: Re: Running tests that require an X server
Written by
Florian Ragwitz(742f2a428e635a5e)
on
2009-5-1 (金) at 11:18 pm
The login currently uses Crypg::OpenPGP, which is rather broken. Porting to Crypt::GpgME has been discussed, but it's probably not going to happen soon. I'd love to see Angerwhale support OpenID, but I'd rather just be blogging and have anonymous comments instead of wasting a lot of time on this. Sorry. :-/
Comments on Running tests that require an X server | 4 comments | Post a comment
Re: Running tests that require an X server
Written by Anonymous Coward (0) on 2009-5-1 (金) at 5:55 pm
COMMENT
This is awesome.
LOGIN FAIL
I tried to log in for a while, but angerwhale claims I'm not 0x9a0cda99... and I most certainly am. That login either needs better directions or smarter behaviors -- otherwise, openid is probably a better option.
[ Link | XML | YAML | Reply... ]
Re: Re: Running tests that require an X server
Written by Florian Ragwitz (742f2a428e635a5e)![[SIGNED]](/static/common/images/lock.png)
on
2009-5-1 (金) at 11:18 pm
The login currently uses Crypg::OpenPGP, which is rather broken. Porting to Crypt::GpgME has been discussed, but it's probably not going to happen soon. I'd love to see Angerwhale support OpenID, but I'd rather just be blogging and have anonymous comments instead of wasting a lot of time on this. Sorry. :-/
[ Parent | Link | XML | YAML | Reply... ]